Accéder au contenu principal

When an Angry Public Wants to be Heard

Managing the nonviolent communication is the key !

In fact, when negotiators get along well and create a climate of confidence : the negotiation is easy, healthy and productive. But if when they get angry, the negotiation becomes difficult : A mechanism of war is put into practice. The negotiator is seeking for everyways to destroy his opponent and forgets all the benefits of a long-term relationship. The interest is no longer to come to an agreement but to win the battle. It's too bad. I prefer considering negotiation as sports competition than a war. The potential gains are more interesting in the sports ! That proves that negotiation and violence are not compatible.
This reading gives us several advices to approach crisis communications and facing an angry public.

1. Acknowledge the concerns of the other side
Using concessions with intelligence et using empathy are two good tools.

2. Encourage joint fact finding
It's emotionally complicated to generate mutual gains. Each side wants to use arguments that cancel the arguments of the other side.
We can distinguish 5 steps in « join fact finding » process work :
- jointly choose a set of respected experts with different views and disciplinary backgrounds
- work with these experts to develop the scientific questions to be adressed
- allow the experts to articulate areas of consensus as well as disagreement
- question of the experts on their analyses with the help of a neutral party
- ask the experts to interpret their findings in light of follow-up questions from the stakesholders

3. Offer contigent commitments
The negotiation is not an exact science. There is a big part of uncertainty and unforeseen in this process. Indeed, the human psychology are highly varied. To fix this diversity, the parties can develop contingent commitments in order to satisfy both sides. This tool offers an alternative to the uncertainty of the future and permits to the negotiation to go forward.

5. Act in a trustworthy manner at all time
In the trustbuilding process we can consider two fundamentals rules : meaning what you say and saying what you mean.

6. Focus on building long-term relationships

The negotiation is a long and complicated process. It is very important to build long-term relationships in order to create reciprocities rather than alter our relationships with our current business partners. For information, gain new customers be 6 times more expensive to company that to keep his customers (or partners) already conviced.

Commentaires

Enregistrer un commentaire

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

EuroMouse Project - Negotiating Across Cultures

This negotiation opposed the Mouse company (An American Multinational Company) and the mayors of 4 towns : Bailly, Coupvray, Magny and Chessy. The Mouse company and the French government signed the Master Agreement to allow Mouse to build Euromouse : a huge amusement park in Marne-La-Vallée. But due to very bad relationships between Mouse and 4 towns involved into the project a negotiation was organized to find solutions and settle the disagreements between the two sides. In this role-play, I played the role of the government official in the Ministry of International Trade. I was very proud of the Master Agreement, this project will increase the influence of the country through the world. The press has been a problem so I am looking for good press releases. Definitely, I felt much more comfortable in this role-play than all the others. I applied more active and effective listening. Moreover, I learned to be less aggresive and more accomodating. During the negotiation I kept
Enregistrer un commentaire
Lire la suite

Chestnut Drive Negotiation

CHESTNUT VILLAGE ROLE PLAY Chesnut Drive is a short, dead-end residential street in Bunyonville.  Many Families live in Chestnut Drive. Few weeks ago, a construction of a 77-unit condominium complex on an eight-acre plot at the end of Chestnut Drive started. The only access to the construction site is by Chestnut Drive. The problem is that there were some accidents involving kids. Moreover, employees drive fast in this street, there is a lot of noise and the street is full of dirt. The neighborhood representatives finally succeeded in obtaining a meeting with the general counsel and members of Bunyon Construction. My role during this negotation : I am the Shopkeeper of the Chesnut Village. I am a small businessperson owner of a clothing store on Off Broadway and of two-family house on Chesnut Drive. Actually, I am quite pleased with this construction project but it is not possible to tell it to my neighbors. I had to use manipulations technics to avoid them knowing it. I w
Enregistrer un commentaire
Lire la suite

The Cinnamon Case and "Win As Much As You Can"

During this roleplay, I played the role of the buyer and Mathilde was the seller. I was pretty much more confident than in the prior negotiations. I think that there is two reasons that can explain this new feeling. The first reason is related to the behavior of Mathilde. Her nonverbal communication was very positive. I am very sensitive person, unfortunately I am often impacted by the vibes of my partners. During this negotiation, the impact was positive. I noticed that Mathilde was showing to me very positive signs and she seemed to be open to the negotiation. For sure, her BATNA was precisely defined and accepted by herself. Furthermore, she told me that she was convinced by the corporate culture of her company. The second reason of my trustbuilding was associated to my understanding of the Four Keys Concept. I had the feeling to be more determinated than Mathilde, actually. My Zone of Possible Agreement was totaly clear. However, I think that my BATNA was not rigorous enough. I
1 commentaire
Lire la suite